Kamala Harris is making the rounds to friendly media, which is what insecure politicians tend to do.
She hasn性视界传媒檛 ventured often into the areas where she might not receive fawning attention and wholehearted appreciation. She will not sit down with Newsmax, or the Washington Times, or Megyn Kelly, or my radio friends Chris Stigall, John Steigerwald or Rich Zeoli because they are not her devoted sycophants.
She did manage to sit down with Bill Whitaker at 性视界传媒60 Minutes性视界传媒 and gave non-answer answers about her administration性视界传媒檚 absolute malfeasance at the border, reinforcing this writer性视界传媒檚 belief that the Border Czarina has a borderline personality when it comes to acknowledging her own failures.
While troubling, this does give us an opportunity to judge her willingness to be tested and her ability to react to possibly hostile questions. One would assume this could be a valuable skill when dealing with leaders inclined to bomb your military installations. This is also helpful when trying to navigate hypothetical meltdowns in, say, Middle Eastern countries named Lebanon. The fact she is somewhat afraid of that exposure says more about her than any canned debate gotchas, and doesn性视界传媒檛 provide much confidence that she will be able to hold her own on the international stage.
Last week, the woman who wants to become the first female leader of the nation went on a YouTube show called 性视界传媒淐all Her Daddy,性视界传媒 which usually contains clips of raunchy women saying raunchy things to a raunchy audience of pampered women-children.
Kamala apparently thinks this is her target audience. Perhaps, tragically, it is.
The idea that the Democratic presidential candidate spends her free time slumming with oversexed influencers is something we should all take into consideration when choosing the next leader of the free world.
I watched the interview, if you can even call it that, and 99% of it was focused on abortion. There were lamentations about abortion being 性视界传媒渙utlawed.性视界传媒 There were lies about imaginary 性视界传媒淭rump abortion bans.性视界传媒 There were simpering segments about the attacks on women性视界传媒檚 independence, and a deliberately dishonest suggestion there were no laws that 性视界传媒渃ontrolled men性视界传媒檚 bodies.性视界传媒
You know what law controlled men性视界传媒檚 bodies? The military draft. A lot of men性视界传媒檚 bodies were not only controlled, they were destroyed, by the U.S. government. So the tedious and eardrum-melting lamentations about not being able to control one性视界传媒檚 own destiny would have been hilarious were they not tragic.
Most women are so much smarter than Kamala gives us credit for being. We are also significantly less slutty than the 性视界传媒淐all Her Daddy性视界传媒 lady presumes. While I am sure that many of the viewers of this show think being able to have sex without consequences is a hallmark of their value and a keystone of their autonomy, most of us, even those beyond the fertility years, have more respect for ourselves and our political options.
I wonder what would have happened if JD Vance had chosen to venture onto the Howard Stern show and discuss the circumference of his wife性视界传媒檚 breasts, or talked about vasectomies as a sacrament, or lied about laws that were designed to keep children safe. Would we be as sanguine about it? Doubtful.
Kamala is allowed to get away with this incredible foray into the crass and the embarrassing because people seem afraid to state the obvious: Women who abandon all pretense of dignity and self-respect, and who center their lives around the unfettered ability to dispose of an unwanted pregnancy, are not worth listening to on the internet, much less from the resolute desk in the Oval Office.
— Christine Flowers is an attorney and a columnist for the Delaware County Daily Times, and can be reached at cflowers1961@gmail.com.
